| There is
some research in intuition or its related phenomena being done. And,
regardless of the results, it is always exciting for me to read. I believe
that we are just at the beginning of exploring intuition, so I suspect that
we are asking the weak or irrelevant questions, but I am at a loss for which
questions might give us data that would reveal meaning…stark, simple,
self-evident meaning. But still fascinating, here are a few research items
I’ve read enough about to let you know a little bit about them and others
that have captured my attention, but not yet the hours to explore them.
Frontal Lobe: Is This The Site of
Intuitive Decision Making?: Professor D’Amasio, Iowa University, did an
interesting piece of research using the card game solitaire (two decks-one
stacked to win in the beginning and then to lose and the other as the control
deck [normal as we understand it]). His prediction was that patients with
frontal lobe damage would never intuit which deck was stacked, but those
without frontal lobe damage would intuit which deck was stacked and choose
the control deck. His measure was skin response indicating anxiety. His
predictions proved correct at the end of the experimentation.
In a private conversation with a Dutch
parapsychologist, I learned that it was his impression that D’amasio
accounted for the intuitive aspect of his results as intrinsic learning
(learning that due to exposure with the topic). The Dutch parapsychologist
believed that D’amasio would be startled to see precognitive aspects of his
data.
Whether you believe intuition is an
intrinsic process or something which transcends our understanding of time,
D’amasio’s results suggest that individual’s might benefit from creating
frontal lobe exercises. Practice intuitive decision making and record your
results. |
 |
 |